Simon Russell Beale as Timon in Timon of Athens (Photo: Johan Persson) |
Timon of Athens is one of Shakespeare‘s most intriguing tragedies; he never wrote anything else quite like it. (Scholars believe that he may have collaborated with Thomas Middleton, the co-writer of The Changeling.) In the first half, the title character extends himself without limit to his friends, staging extravagant banquets, showering them with expensive gifts, bailing out one young man when he runs afoul of the law. But when his generosity bankrupts him and he’s forced to call on the same friends for loans, they make up excuses. At this juncture Timon’s kindness turns to acid; he invites them to one last feast to mock them and erupt in fury at their betrayal, then leaves Athens to live in a cave. Up to this point the play seems to share a dramatic trajectory with Coriolanus – in both the protagonists are provoked into turning their backs on their cities – but in the second half Timon is truly unorthodox. The action all but stops dead. Timon discovers gold in his cave, but it’s ceased to have any meaning for him (he observes sardonically that he can’t eat it). He’s visited by a series of men – his devoted steward Flavius (who’d tried unsuccessfully to warn him that he was blowing through his funds), Athenians on various self-interested missions, but most memorably the cynical philosopher Apemantus, an unwilling guest at Timon’s parties whose truth-telling now provides a kind of humanity for him in his reduced – and newly conscious – state. Their long interchange, which is undeniably the highlight of the second half of the play, is either, depending on how a director chooses to interpret it, a Beckettian encounter in the wilderness or a means of exploring Timon’s psychic journey into darkness.
Simon Russell Beale and Hilton MacRae |
Hilton MacRae plays Apemantus with more gentleness and
understatement than anyone else I’ve seen in this role, which isn’t to say that
he softens the philosopher’s uncompromising toughness. Tonally it’s a smart
option, since Beale’s tirades are so powerful. Their scene together in Timon’s
cave – in this production he lives like a homeless man on the outskirts of the
city – is a moving exchange between two souls whose shared bitter vision of the
world enables them to come together, though the style of their communication is
mockery and insult. Among the excellent supporting cast Tom Robertson is a
stand-out as Ventidius (the young man Timon goes bail for), here rendered as an
entitled brat with a coke habit, a prime example of a “Sloane ranger.” NT
Live captured the closing night performance at the Olivier, which was
greeted with cheers – now pro forma in American houses, but still a sign of
distinction in the English theatre.
It’s hard to mount a good production of King Lear,
but it seems to be almost impossible to make Hamlet work on stage – a
fact that has always puzzled me. I’ve seen some great Lears but though I
can think of several worthy cinematic Hamlets, I’ve never seen the play
come together in the theatre. The traveling production from Shakespeare’s Globe
in London, directed by Dominic Dromgoole and Bill Buckhurst with a cast of ten
actors and musicians, is the latest disappointment. The pared-down staging,
which draws repeatedly from a limited repertory of props and small set pieces,
is sometimes clever, e.g., the use of a pair of boards to line the walk the
Ghost (Dickon Tyrell) leads Hamlet (Michael Benz) through toward the cliff
where they have their first private moment. I liked the idea of Ophelia
(Carlyss Peer) appearing on a ladder above the upper level of the set to
reprise her melancholy ballad, “He is dead and gone, lady,” while her shrouded
body is being laid in the ground below. But these staging tricks are the only
ideas in the show, which is a hodge-podge of styles and periods and doesn’t
seem to mean anything. Christopher Saul’s Polonius, doddering and pompous,
could have stepped out of any trite Victorian version of the play, while
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (Peter Bray and Matthew Romain) show up at
Elsinore with tennis rackets and silly caps, like Oxbridge undergraduates from
the 1950s, and Claudius (Tyrell) calls them “Rosenblitz and Guggenheim.” The
play within the play is loaded with ludicrous mugging, especially from Miranda
Foster as the Player Queen. (She isn’t much better as Gertrude.) Benz is best
in the soliloquies; they have focus and shape. Otherwise all you get from this
Hamlet is that he certainly seems young (he comes across as about eighteen).
The production gets a little better in the second half – the last scene isn’t
bad – but it adds precisely nothing to our understanding of Hamlet.
– Steve Vineberg is Distinguished Professor
of the Arts and Humanities at College of the Holy Cross in Worcester,
Massachusetts, where he teaches theatre and film. He also writes for The
Threepenny Review and The Boston Phoenix and is the
author of three books: Method Actors: Three Generations of an American
Acting Style; No Surprises, Please: Movies in the Reagan Decade;
and High Comedy in American Movies.
No comments:
Post a Comment