J. Smith-Cameron and Laila Robins in Sorry (Photo by Joan Marcus) |
Since I was a fan of both the first two parts of Richard Nelson’s Apple family tetralogy, That Hopey Changey Thing and Sweet and Sad, I would like to report that with Sorry, which he wrote to coincide with the presidential election, he hits another ball out of the park. But it’s something of a disappointment, despite the obvious intelligence of the writing and the usual skill of the acting. (As with the earlier entries, Nelson also directed.) Nelson’s coup with the first two plays is that he managed to create a plausible, compelling family of New York state liberals whose conversation veers easily and provocatively into the political. The plays aren’t doctrinaire or preachy; they’re political dramas by virtue of their setting (That Hopey Changey Thing opened around the time of the mid-term elections, Sweet and Sad on the tenth anniversary of 9/11) and the savvy of the well-read, articulate, deep-thinking quartet of main characters: a brother and three sisters meeting up at the home of one (now two) of the sisters in upstate Rhinebeck. But Sorry doesn’t manage the balance of the personal and the political with the grace and fluidity of the earlier plays (though the 9/11 content of Sweet and Sad, to be truthful, was its weak point). For an hour the election is barely mentioned and then, abruptly, the dialogue picks it up. For the first time in the Apple series, when the characters begin to discuss politics, I don’t quite believe it.
Jon Devries and Maryann Plunkett (Photo by Joan Marcus) |
Some of the dialogue appears to overlap with the earlier plays: Richard’s speech about the way Democrats obsess about defining themselves as not Republicans sounds a lot like his spiel in That Hopey Changey Thing, and Marian’s allusion to listening to the music her daughter left on her iPod comes right out of Sorry. Aside from the Benjamin plot, the play doesn’t seem to have much of its own to propel itself, and it’s not clear how that story line links up with the election (or, for that matter, why we listen to Benjamin read Oscar Wilde’s letter from Reading Gaol to Lord Alfred Douglas, which he’s preparing for a talent show). The play isn’t difficult to sit through, but it does amble; I couldn’t say with certainty what it’s about. And Nelson doesn’t seem to know how to end it; he just cuts it off at around the two-hour point. Perhaps he’ll rediscover his inspiration by the final chapter.
– Steve Vineberg is Distinguished Professor of the Arts and Humanities at College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, where he teaches theatre and film. He also writes forThe Threepenny Review, The Boston Phoenix and is the author of three books: Method Actors: Three Generations of an American Acting Style; No Surprises, Please: Movies in the Reagan Decade; and High Comedy in American Movies.
No comments:
Post a Comment