Chase Williamson, as Dave, in John Dies at the End |
One of my favorite movie books is J. Hoberman and Jonathan Rosenbaum’s Midnight Movies, which was first published in 1983 when the midnight movie as countercultural phenomenon was about to go the way of all flesh, displaced by the convenience and insular charms of home video. Hoberman captured the special appeal of midnight movies when he wrote of “epic, environmental films – really crazy ones,” that “instead of dreaming, you could spend the night with these visions.” One of the earliest and most prolific creators of midnight hits was George Romero, whose Night of the Living Dead came out in 1968 and played the international midnight circuit for years, and who followed it up with both the sequel Dawn of the Dead and his riff on vampire mythology, Martin. And the midnight horror movie reached an apotheosis in 1985 with Stuart Gordon’s Re-Animator, which, like Kathryn Bigelow’s Near Dark, was probably ultimately seen by far more people who caught it on video than in a theater. Not all the major midnight hits were horror movies, but most of them – Eraserhead, El Topo – were nightmares of some kind, and even the congenial, geek-show vaudeville of early John Waters and the communal-utopian The Rocky Horror Picture Show, drew much of their appeal from their fans’ sense that they were identifying with people who could have starred in their parents’ nightmares.
Even
without an actual, theater-going subculture for the movies themselves to tap
into, there remains a special, hip allure to a horror or fantasy picture that
can generate a plausible “midnight” vibe – that seems as if it would be a
natural to tap into that audience, if it still existed. The Toronto
International Film Festival, which has managed for years now to cling tight to
a reputation as the premiere film festival for that select group that actually
attends film festivals to see movies, still programs its “Midnight
Madness” lineup every year, and now that several of last year’s entries have
trickled into theaters (and onto Video On Demand), civilians and people who
couldn’t schedule their vacations for September can get a taste of what passes
for hip horror these days. The ABCs Of Murder and John Dies at the
End, and another recent horror picture, V/H/S, may provide some
hints about the current state of the midnight movie gene and how today’s indie-genre filmmakers are trying to tap into it.
Both V/H/S and ABCs are multiple-director anthology films – a type of movie that has had a bad rap since, oh, at least since Fantasia, and not without reason. Anthology horror movies are especially problematic; other kinds of anthology films have to reach a climax and then restart, but they may at least offer the promise of some variety, where movies like these have to scare the living bejesus out of you, stop, restart, then do it again. Of the half-dozen stories in V/H/S, the most strikingly effective is the first (not counting the framing story), a young-male-anxiety nightmare about picking up a scary chick, which was directed by David Bruckner. By a funny coincidence, Brucker’s only previous feature work was directing the opening third of the multiple-director horror movie The Signal, which was far and away the best part of that movie. I don’t know if he has an unusual career niche, or if this just says something about how hard it is now for a talented young filmmaker to get the chance to make a whole movie.
Both V/H/S and ABCs are multiple-director anthology films – a type of movie that has had a bad rap since, oh, at least since Fantasia, and not without reason. Anthology horror movies are especially problematic; other kinds of anthology films have to reach a climax and then restart, but they may at least offer the promise of some variety, where movies like these have to scare the living bejesus out of you, stop, restart, then do it again. Of the half-dozen stories in V/H/S, the most strikingly effective is the first (not counting the framing story), a young-male-anxiety nightmare about picking up a scary chick, which was directed by David Bruckner. By a funny coincidence, Brucker’s only previous feature work was directing the opening third of the multiple-director horror movie The Signal, which was far and away the best part of that movie. I don’t know if he has an unusual career niche, or if this just says something about how hard it is now for a talented young filmmaker to get the chance to make a whole movie.
The
framing story involves a gang of louts who shoot footage of themselves
committing various heinous acts, and who have been contracted to break into a
house and steal a VHS tape. Naturally, their search for the tape involves a lot
of hit-or-miss loading of tapes into the VCR, which is how we get to see the
other segments of the movie, all of which are shot in faux-found-footage style.
Most of the fun has beaten out of the found-footage-horror genre in the
fourteen years since The Blair Witch Project, a movie that, thanks to
its clever use of the Internet and cable TV as part of its marketing push, felt
like a new, up-to-the-minute kind of multimedia prank in 1999. It says
something about how much water has passed under that bridge by now that V/H/S,
with its meticulously created look of crappy homemade video, tries for a slightly
old-school retro charm at the same time that’s it’s trying to catch a ride on
the tail wind of the Paranormal Activity movies and Chronicle and
the original The Last Exorcism.
Surprisingly,
the most interesting segment here besides Bruckner’s comes from Joe Swanberg, a
specialist in sleepy-time “mumblecore” movies like Hannah Takes the Stairs.
It’s a paranoid fantasy about a woman who finds something funny implanted in
her arm. It’s too talky by half, but the outlines of something intriguing poke
through, and in this kind of movie, an arresting outline feels as if it counts
for something. Ti West turns in a video recording the mysterious stalking of a
couple on their honeymoon. West is a hot item among aficionados of indie
horror, but I don’t quite get the excitement some people have expressed over
his films, such as House of the Devil and The Innkeepers. Their
charm is supposedly based on how masterfully he recreates the look and feel
(and hairdos) of slightly boring, jerry-rigged and padded-out scare movies from
the early ‘80s, and if that’s really his aim, he pulls it off, but why would
anyone want to recreate, without irony or any larger contextual meaning, movies
that had people coughing at looking at their watches the first time around? I sure
don’t understand why anyone who wound up sitting through one of them would feel
as if the director had done them a favor. V/H/S finally stumbles to a
close with an embarrassing version of the old “Hey, I think those guys
pretending to be devil worshippers about to sacrifice a girl on Halloween may
be the real thing!” gag, wrapping up with the all-purpose ending that Michael
O’Donoghue once shared with readers of the National Lampoon: “Suddenly,
they were run over by a truck.”
Don
Coscarelli’s John Dies at the End is at least a real movie, sort of.
Coscarelli is one of those filmmakers I’ve always liked the idea of. He’s
probably best-known for the low-budget horror movie Phantasm, which he
made, for $300,000 (in 1979 bucks), when he was 25; since then, he’s signed his
name to the ‘80s basic cable perennial The Beastmaster and the 2002 Bubba
Ho-Tep, in which the secretly still-living Elvis Presley (Bruce Campbell)
faces off against a murderous reanimated mummy preying on the inhabitants of a
Texas nursing home. The story of John Dies at the End – which is based on
a novel (first published on the Internet) by the pseudonymous David Wong – makes
even that plot synopsis seem like a slow night on Playhouse 90. It’s
narrated by the hero, David (Chase Williamson) to a reporter (Paul Giamatti),
and involves a visionary drug called 'Soy Sauce', supernatural visitors from
another dimension, and a TV psychic named Albert Marconi (Clancy Brown), who
actually knows something you don’t know.
Coscarelli
has an honest entertainer’s desire to ply his audiences with cheap thrills;
what he lacks, after some 35 years in the business and with surprisingly few
movies to show for it, is the style to put it all together in a pleasurable,
half-coherent way, and the conviction to make it mean something. John Dies
at the End marks some kind of step up for him, because it may be the first
of his feature films that looks better than something you’d praise as being
pretty good, for something that was made by a 25-year-old kid with $300,000 – and
only someone who was being unduly kind would have said even that about Bubba
Ho-Tep. The new movie is watchable as a collection of random scenes of
weird shit, but any chance that it might become more than that is undercut by
the director’s giggly lack of nerve, which begins to feel self-deprecating and
finally borders on self-contempt.
He
actually got a beautiful performance out of Bruce Campbell as the heroic, aged
Elvis in Bubba Ho-Tep, but he tossed it away, and there are moments here
when he has the characters making the kind of jokes that wiseasses in the
audience might make, while they’re right in the middle of the action. (When the
heroes pass through a dimensional portal and are greeted by a procession of
masked, nude women, one of them deadpans, “This must be the Eyes Wide Shut
planet.”) John Does at the End doesn’t lack for imagination, but
Coscarelli’s work was more entertaining when it was riddled with dead spots but
the director hadn’t yet become so adept at winking at the audience. Dawn of
the Dead and Re-Animator didn’t wink, either; even at their most slapstick-farcical,
the directors of those pictures weren’t about to let you catch them smirking at
their own material, which is how they were able to cast a spell. Too many
people making indie genre pictures today are less interested in weaving a
vision than in making a movie and the MST3K version at the same time.
– Phil Dyess-Nugent is a freelance writer living in Texas. He regularly writes about TV and books for The A. V. Club.
No comments:
Post a Comment