Matthew McConaughey stars in Jeff Nichols' Mud |
Jeff Nichols, the writer-director of Shotgun Stories (2007), Take Shelter (2011), and the new Mud (which played at the 2012 Cannes Film Festival, but has only opened in theatres in the past few weeks), would have been called a “regional filmmaker” before 1989 or so, when “independent filmmaking” caught on as both shorthand for a movement and a marketing term. “Regional filmmaker,” a label that got stuck on directors as dissimilar as Richard Pearce (Heartland) and the late Eagle Pennell (The Whole Shootin’ Match), may have had its uses as a descriptive term for filmmakers working in parts of the country that weren’t often visited by film crews, but it was also a little condescending, based as it was on the assumption that any place outside Los Angeles or New York was the boondocks. (Being an independent filmmaker is more of a boast, since no one who’s ever been to a multiplex needs to be told what the indie filmmakers mean to be independent of.)
Still, it has a special resonance for someone like Nichols, who grew up in Little Rock, studied film in North Carolina, and whose early films came across as self-consciously, even ostentatiously about life as it’s lived far from the urban centers. I wasn’t as taken with Shotgun Stories and Take Shelter as much as some critics were, and I wonder how much that might have to do with the fact that I grew up in Mississippi and don’t see anything especially exotic about working-poor guys living in Arkansas. Nichols has talent, but in Shotgun Stories especially, he also had a beginner’s clumsiness, and just enough pretentiousness leaks through his film’s plain, rough-hewn surfaces to let the viewer see that he’s a conscious artist, not just some lug with a camera who won the service of Michael Shannon in a poker game. This is a combination that speaks directly to the kinds of critics who get very excited when they have the rare chance to acclaim a movie as a work of “folk art.” Mud has its clumsy moments, too, but I like it much more than Nichols’ earlier films. Part of that has to do with its being more alive visually; it was shot by his usual cinematographer, Adam Stone, but the camera work is more active than before, sometimes circling the action as if Stone had been binging on classic De Palma. A lot of it has to do with Matthew McConaughey.
Matthew McConaughey and Tye Sheridan in Mud |
It wasn’t long ago at all that McConaughey seemed to be the living embodiment of what “independent” film artists are supposed to be independent of, and of the dangers that getting too close to “the industry” can act upon them like Kryptonite. I don’t know that I have many friends who didn’t fall in love with McConaughey the first time they saw him, as the oddly charming sleazeball who still likes to hang out with high school kids in Richard Linklater’s Dazed and Confused. (Explaining his fondness for high school girls, he drawls that he keeps getting older, but “they” – meaning the latest crop – “stay the same age.” Come to think of it, I don’t know how many friends I have who won’t do an impression of him delivering that line at the drop of a hat.) But most of the big roles in big movies that he did in the wake of that small comic turn (A Time to Kill, Amistad, Contact) showed an actor bring pushed to the front of the line before he was ready, and the most memorable work he did in the ‘aughts was in tabloid stories and half-baked – in more than once sense – interviews.
Reese Witherspoon as Juniper, in Mud |
Whatever brought McConaughey to this role, it’s hard to imagine anyone else filling it out as well. The boys, feeling the pressures of adult life eating into their territory, go looking for freedom and adventure and find Mud, who seems to embody those qualities even while reduced to hiding in a swamp and asking stray children if they could scrounge up something for him to eat. Sun-baked and tattooed, with cross-shaped nails in his boot heels (so that his footprints will serve to ward off evil) and an image of a snake on his chest (to remind him not to get bitten by the crafty devils), he’s everything that a boy on the verge of adolescence might idolize. Rash, impulsively violent, reluctant to face up to responsibility and dreamily untethered to reality, he’s also everything that the adults have had to shuck off to try to make their way in the world. He’s a killer, but as difficult to judge as a puppy with a dead bird in its mouth. The performance is a work of art, and it enables you, for once, to watch a Nichols movie without being constantly aware than art is what the director is reaching for. (Nichols’ other movies took their tone from doomy, heavy-spirited lead characters played by the ever-intense Michael Shannon. Shannon appears here in a loose, funny supporting role, as Neckbone’s parental surrogate and aspiring ladies’ man, a part that Nichols might have written for him as a thank-you for past services rendered.)
Mud is a romantic outlaw, and it’s the romantic part that Ellis responds to. Ellis’ parents are breaking up, and in his anger and confusion, he briefly attracts the attention of a pretty older girl whose confusion, insecurity, and drive to experiment with different guys are perceived by Ellis as the fickleness of a heartless tease. Ellis is eager to believe in the purity of Mud’s love and to act as a go-between for him and Juniper (played by a deglamorized, damn near reborn Reese Witherspoon). Juniper, who is mostly glimpsed from a distance, has a distressed air, appropriate to a Juliet whose Romeo is in hiding with a price on his head. But she also has bruises on her face, and Mud may think he had good reason to put them there, even as he believes that they can put their problems behind them and sail off into a clear future together.
Ray McKinnon in Mud |
Mud builds to an action climax that’s surprisingly well-executed but is a little off-key; it doesn’t fit in with the rest of the film. And all the boom and thunder count for less in the end than Ellis’ final grin, signaling that he may be down in the love wars, but he hasn’t counted himself out yet. If there’s anything disappointing about Mud, it’s that it grows more predictable, instead of less, in its concluding scenes. The violent showdown is the most conventional thing about this movie, which could have expanded on Mud’s superstitious views and surreal fantasies to become ever wilder and stranger. But maybe the fact that stars of Ghosts of Girlfriends Past and This Means War could give the performances they give here is all the wildness and strangeness than anyone needs from a night at the movies.
– Phil Dyess-Nugent is a freelance writer living in Texas. He regularly writes about TV and books for The A. V. Club.
No comments:
Post a Comment