Independent reviews of television, movies, books, music, theatre, dance, culture, and the arts.
Pages
▼
Sunday, September 15, 2013
The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones – Just Read the Books
Lily Collins and Jamie Campbell Bower in The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones
The following
contains spoilers for The Mortal Instruments, both the film and the book
series.
If I were writing this
to let you all know how notably underwhelming the recently released The
Mortal Instruments: City of Bones is, I know that I’m a little late to the
party. Even if you weren’t aware of the film, or author Cassandra Clare’s multi-volume
teen fantasy book series that inspired it, you probably heard that resounding
flopping sound the movie generated when it premiered in theatres a couple of
weeks ago. Just this past Thursday in fact the studio put the planned sequel (based on the second novel City of Ashes) on indefinite
hold. It is probably for the best.
Directed by Harald
Zwart (The Karate Kid, 2010), and starring Lily Collins and Jamie
Campbell Bower (who played the centuries-old vampire Caius in the Twilight
films), City of Bones is a bit of a hot mess: pretty to look at but remarkably
frustrating to follow. In fact, that is the most apt word to describe the
experience of watching City of Bones: frustrating. The movie – clocking
in at over 2 hours – feels both unbearably long and exasperatingly hurried.
I’ve read all five published books of the Mortal Instruments series,
including Clare’s more readable Infernal Devices
prequel trilogy, and even I found the film difficult to follow – and even more
difficult to like. I enjoyed the books, mind you, but I confess they don’t live
long in your consciousness after putting them down. Clare has produced a
believable world on the page, and offers a number of interesting twists on the
vampire/werewolf/demon narrative, but little of that makes it onto the big
screen. The result is a film that no doubt would anger a fan of the books and
confuse the average moviegoer.
Jemina West, Kevin Zegers, & Bower out huntin' demons
Adapting a popular
book series for the screen is certainly a risk for studios and filmmakers, and
for the every commercially successful venture – see Harry Potter or Twilight
– there are many more that die on the table – see The Golden Compass (2007)or
A Series of Unfortunate Events (2004). (Admittedly the very worst one could say
about the latter two films is that they are decidedly unremarkable adaptations
of fairly remarkable – but arguably unadaptable – books: Philip Pullman's His
Dark Materials trilogy is among the most extraordinary young adult
book series to have been published in a generation, and the charm and moral insight
of Daniel Handler’s Lemony Snicket books rest largely on the
untranslatable voice of the books’ narrator.) Tasked with not only telling a
story but also with a building an entire universe for that story to inhabit,
the first entry of any film adaptation is especially challenging, but even on
those terms, The City of Bones seemed to barely be trying.
Here’s what you need
to know: on the eve of her sixteenth birthday, Clary Fray’s world is
turned inside out when she discovers that instead of being a normal, alienated Brooklyn teenager, she in fact comes from a long line of
demon hunters. Returning home one day to find her apartment ransacked and her
mother (Lena Headey, Games of Thrones) missing, Clary (Collins) clumsily but
effectively dispatches a demon, and, along with her best friend, Simon, fall in
with the local crew of Shadowhunters. There she meets Jace (Bower), for whom
she feels an immediate attraction, who introduces her to the world of demons,
vampires, and werewolves that apparently exists just out of view. (This conceit
– like just beneath the surface of our modern cities is another world, parallel
but invisible to all but those able to see it – is rather compelling. When I
picked up the first novel, I was reminded of Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere,
which did much the same thing to contemporary London. In Clare’s version however we are
firmly in hipster Brooklyn, and through the
eyes of our young heroes, the story unfold in uniquely American ways.)
All of this is roughly
how it plays out in the book City of Bones, and indeed the film’s first
30 minutes or so work fairly well (there is, for example, a rather effective
“emotional breakdown in the rain” moment as the reality of what she has been
experiencing hits Clary all at once). But as soon as the action flares up, the
intelligence of our main characters takes a sharp decline--in direct proportion
to the increase in special effects. Where the book succeeds and where the film
falls dramatically short is in its capacity to successfully create the world
the story inhabits. World-building takes times, but the film’s focus on the
growing desire between Clary and Jace leaves little room for that. The result
is a kind of hodgepodge of CGI setpieces, simmering stares, and swelling music.
Robert Sheehan as Simon Lewis
Film, needless to say,
is a different medium than the novel and deserves to be taken as such. For
every mediocre film adaptation of a great novel, there are more than enough
examples of great films drawn from mediocre novels. I try to walk into the
theatre expecting – and indeed hoping – to see something new, even when I am
already familiar with the source material. In the case of City of Bones, this was far
easier, since I came with few investments in the narrative. Okay, I confess I
did have at least one hopeful expectation: my favourite part of the books,
Simon Lewis (played Misfits’ charismatic Robert Sheehan), Clary’s best
friend and soon-to-be Jewish vampire, is given short shrift in the screenplay. Though, to be fair, Simon’s transformation
from nerdy, Dungeons-and-Dragons playing, wannabe rocker, Jewish sidekick to
nerdy, Dungeons-and-Dragons playing, wannabe rocker, Jewish vampire doesn’t
fully manifest until the second novel, Simon is almost an afterthought in the
film. Irish Sheehan, adopting a believable American accent for the role, does
rather well with the material he is given, but he isn’t given a lot. Along with
his Jewishness, which plays more than an incidental role in the fascinating
trajectory of his character over the course of the novels (and rewards us with
some of the books’ best lines:“What
freaks out Jewish vampires? Silver stars of David? Chopped liver? Checks for 18
dollars?”), what little we get to see of Simon’s ironic and
grounded sensibility is at odds with the melodramatic tenor of the rest of the
film. Moreover as Simon, and therefore by necessity Simon and Clary's sweetly
and realistically rendered friendship, moves into the background, the story loses
a crucial counterbalance to the burning lust-at-first-sight intensity of Clary
and Jace's relationship.
Despite the sometimes
overblown teen romance emphasis of the novels (a feature which likely makes the
books attractive to many of the young readers of Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight saga),
Cassandra Clare’s Brooklyn is populated by
realistic characters who rarely forget they live in the 21st century. Both Simon and Clary are pop culture geeks whose experience of this
newly-revealed fantastic realm is filtered through the movies, television, and
video games they know all too well. The characters in the novels do often have
a kind of contemporary intelligence – especially in the character of Simon –
and meet that world’s vampires, werewolves, and fairies with some pop culture
literacy in that regard. But little of that is in the film (note to the
screenwriter: one Ghostbusters reference does not make a film
self-aware), and more to the point, the characters actually seem – to put it
bluntly – rather stupid. (As an egregious case in point, just after a lengthy
barroom battle with a posse of rapid vampires, Clary sees but then ignores
what is obviously a bite mark on Simon’s neck. Her incomprehensible disregard
for her supposed best friend’s well being implies she is either almost
pathologically self-centred or just plain dense. Two minutes later, Simon notes
that his lifelong poor eyesight seems to have mysteriously corrected itself,
and then dismisses this fact with an amused half-shrug.)
Collins and Bower in mid-smolder (also Sheehan, centre)
There is a lot of
great stuff in the books, mainly in the ever-expanding universe that the
Shadowhunters inhabit, rich parallel histories and cultures of warlocks,
vampires, werewolves, and faeries.
But, in the film, the vampires are reduced to animalistic monsters (without
culture or even it seems the ability to speak?) and our teen heroes seem to be
the only remaining Shadowhunters on the planet. The failed Shadowhunter
rebellion of 15 years earlier, which is supposed to have set the drama in
motion, is barely described, and I can’t imagine how an untutored viewer could
have made sense of it or the motivations of Valentine (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) the
film’s villain. Though, to be honest, considering the number of liberties the
script took in relation to its source material, I’m not sure fans of the books
were any better off.
If you have read the
books, you know that there is an incestuous elephant in the room that needs to be
immediately addressed (and what follows are MAJOR SPOILERS for both the books
and the movie): near the end of the first novel, it is revealed that
(apparently) Clary and Jace are full blood siblings. This state of affairs remains
a ‘fact’ until the climax of the third book. I confess, I was never completely
sure that this actually worked on the page – it was certainly at odds with the
author’s effort to keep the still-burning (now impossible to consummate) desire
between the two centre stage. It certainly made for a sometimes uncomfortable
read, and no doubt almost everyone who read the books was waiting to see
precisely how the film would negotiate it. (It is one thing, after all, to read
descriptions of the turmoil these revelations prompted in the two characters;
it is yet another to watch it unfold before your eyes.) Moreover, their purported siblinghood is more
than just a source of taboo titillation for the readers or inner sexual turmoil
for the characters; it’s also the source of one of the few substantial thematic
through lines of the books series. Their parallel identity crises when
confronted with the villainy of their “father” Valentine – for Clary, who owes
nothing to the man besides DNA, and for Jace who (whatever his parentage) was
actually raised by the man – are the meat of the story for much of the series.
The first of many awkward commutes for the young couple
Which is why the
film’s cowardly and unthinking ‘solution’ to this is so especially galling:
they dismiss the entire plot element, without ambiguity or open-endedness, as a
deliberate (and somehow off-the-cuff) lying tactic by Valentine. The script
throws away vast aspects of Jace’s personal story, but it would at first appear
to resolve the issue: the audience is never to entertain the real
possibility that Clary and Jace are siblings. Fine… But that’s not how it plays
out: because Clary and Jace still believe it. (There’s a 20-second
closing shot of the two of them snuggling on the motorcycle is almost
unwatchable on these terms. I have no idea how an entire film could have been
endured.) The end result is the pointless sacrifice of an essential feature of
the story, with no discernible benefit. Again, whatever ambivalence I may have
for that aspect of the story, I am not sure there is much left to tell once it
is left behind.
Perhaps novelists
should leave the dream of selling film rights behind, and look to television
instead. If I were an author, I’d be shopping my books around Netflix or the
cable networks, and keep a wide berth from major movie studios. The Game of
Thrones andTrue Bloodmodel of a-novel-a-season is far more
conducive to the scope and tone of adapting from the page – especially
considering the scope and depth required to build a rich, populated world. A TV
series could perhaps have done justice to the world Clare has created.
Or better yet, just
read the books and pretend the film never happened. I suspect that's the studio’s
plan.
– Mark Clamen is
a writer, critic, film programmer and lifelong television enthusiast.
He lives in Toronto, where he often lectures on television, film, and
popular culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment