The CERN Large Hadron Collider, in Mark Levinson's documentary Particle Fever |
The challenge of Particle Fever is to distil a hugely complex subject into something we can grasp and appreciate: the hunt for the elusive Higgs boson particle, and through it a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe. It rises to the challenge, presenting a deeply momentous scientific undertaking with passionate clarity. But I’m not sure it will convert those who are not already scientifically-inclined. For those of us who retain the thirst for knowledge we cultivated as children, however, it’s an exciting ride. The film focuses on the theoretical and experimental physicists who gather at Europe’s CERN from all corners of the globe in 2008, before the switch was first flipped on the Large Hadron Collider – a singular moment in the history of science, where literally everything we thought we knew about the universe and how it worked was up in the air. These scientists were buzzing with excitement at the prospect of gathering some truly unprecedented data, using the largest and most complex tool ever designed by human hands. As one physicist remarks, it’s “history happening right before our eyes.”
The idea has a dizzying import,
and the physicists who are interviewed demonstrate no small amount of
passion (and anxiety) about their work. Some, like Princeton’s Nima
Arkadi-Hamed, are troubled by doubts that the LHC might show our
understanding of physics to be utterly flawed (conforming to a
“multiverse” theory, which if proven correct would halt the
progress of all physics). Others like Savas Dimopolous of Stanford
are more hopeful, believing (or, perhaps, wanting to believe) that
the data will reveal a massively broad spectrum of new insight
(what’s called the “supersymmetry” model). The drama in Particle Fever coalesces from this central struggle between “Will we be
proven right?” or “Will we be proven terribly, terribly wrong?.” Unfortunately, this drama can sometimes feel manufactured and
unconvincing. A sense of spectacle is probably appropriate,
considering the lofty subject matter, but some technical issues
(choppy audio dubbing, painfully obvious restructuring of events
through editing, etc) broke the immersion for me. The visual
component are also somewhat lacking – the necessary bar
graphs, infographics, and charts are helpful in breaking down some
important concepts, such as the difference between the multiverse
theory and the supersymmetry model. But some of the CG effects in
these sequences look oddly bad, almost dated, and one wonders whether
it wouldn’t have been simpler to do away with them altogether.
These explanatory segments are few and far between, however, leaving
plenty of room to watch these scientists squirm with anticipation
once the big machine is finally turned on for the first time.
My only other major gripe is with the
ending, which doesn’t provide nearly as conclusive an answer as I’d
hoped. The bulk of Particle Fever is lead-up – what will happen when the
LHC comes online? – and the result is…well, inconclusive. It
reminds me of Titanic,
in a way – we already know the ending, but it strings us
along in the futile, suspended-disbelief hope that it might somehow
play out differently. The Higgs particle was confirmed to exist, but
the battle between the multiverse and supersymmetry theories is far
from over, and what we learned from the experience isn’t clear even
to this day. The disappointment I felt at such an anticlimactic
conclusion can’t be laid at the feet of the filmmakers – one
can’t exactly complain about Titanic lacking a happy ending,
either – but it leaves a dull impression nonetheless.
These are minor complaints, however,
and as a whole Particle Fever impresses with its animated
interviews and solid pacing, and it deserves credit for bringing such
an important story in the history of modern science to a level that
anyone can appreciate. Even if you’re not at all interested in
physics, this is a documentary that will have you asking questions
about the way our universe works. I’m sure that is exactly the
point.
– Justin Cummings is a writer, blogger, playwright, and graduate of Queen's University's English Language & Literature program. He has been an avid gamer and industry commentator since he first fed a coin into a Donkey Kong machine. He is currently pursuing a career in games journalism and criticism in Toronto.
It's not germane to your topic, but as an interesting subplot, the USA lost it's opportunity to lead the world in this research when it cut funding to the Tevetron project in 1993. Now, US scientists play a role, but only as contributors and collaborators.
ReplyDelete