Benedict Cumberbatch as Alan Turing, in The Imitation Game |
Filmgoers, like gamers, are natural puzzle-solvers – we like to try and stay one step ahead of a mystery, or piece together a disjointed narrative, or guess at a film’s ending before it arrives. There isn’t much to unravel in The Imitation Game, a film which depicts the life of mathematician Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch) and his attempts to crack the German Enigma code at the secret Bletchley Park facility in World War II, but the way the film positions society’s smartest (and most socially awkward) members as the world’s last hope against the Nazi menace is almost as much a love letter to geeky hobbyism as it is a biopic of the world’s first computer scientist. The film isn’t complex enough to be a puzzle unto itself, but so many puzzles abound for the characters to solve – crossword and code-message alike – that it feels like a celebration of how using brains, and not brawn, is often what wins a global war.
Cumberbatch resists the temptation to make Turing (who in this cinematic imagining probably falls somewhere on the high-functioning autism/Asperger’s spectrum, although this is never explicity stated) an automaton or a caricature. His Turing is a person of powerful, broiling emotion that rarely makes its way to the surface, less of a Sheldon or Sherlock and more of a man struggling to reconcile the world he sees with the one that really exists. There is a weirdly charming chemistry between the self-professed "odd duck" Turing and the misfit Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley), who is especially endearing because she was cast against type. Knightley normally plays feisty ingenues or Manic Pixie Dream Girls, and she makes Joan less of the romantic interest you might expect and more of a functional foil for the socially-stunted Turing, which is far more engaging to watch. Mark Strong and Charles Dance (better known as the brilliantly brutal scion of House Lannister) turn in the most interesting supporting roles, as the figureheads of British government who enable Turing to succeed while doubting his ability to do so.
Keira Knightley and Benedict Cumberbatch |
Game makes efficient Oscar bait thanks to this powerful
performance by Cumberbatch (and his amazingly well-cast younger self, played by
Alex Lawther, who is so in tune with Cumberbatch’s performance that I think the
two actors must have worked together to make their speech patterns and
mannerisms match). But despite
the talent of its lead actors, the film blazes no new trails, with almost the
same story points as an underdog sports movie. Moreover, it’s troublingly
inaccurate and artificially dramatized, as all prestige biopics are. The
inclusion of storylines about Soviet spy infiltration into Bletchley Park,
including aspersions cast on the loyalty of Turing himself, are especially
disconcerting. They’re hollow and superfluous attempts at further dramatization
of an already interesting story, and don’t belong in a film that seeks to give
Turing the credit he richly deserves.
Thankfully, though, Game rises above the other entries in the biopic genre from earlier
in the year, especially The Theory of Everything. Game is not as maudlin or trite as Theory, and the actors here save the
day –while in Theory even a committed
performance from Eddie Redmayne couldn't salvage the film’s shoddy direction
and rubber-stamp script. Game connects the man's work with his life and makes a point to show the way
his scientific achievements affect both his self-worth and his personal
relationships. That said, I still would have been interested to hear
Turing describe the inner mechanical workings of “Christopher” and how “he”
operates, being that the infinitely complex computers we all carry in our
pockets were partially born from “his” bloodline. Heaven forbid they put some
technical detail in a movie about mathematicians and the birth of computer
science – they don’t want their audience falling asleep on them, after all.
While Game struggles to balance its myriad
themes – unjust sexual persecution, national loyalty, personal empathy, geekdom
as strength – a crackerjack historical drama is playing out in the background.
As it turns out, deciphering Enigma is just the first of many problems Turing
has to solve, and the excitement of his story can sometimes get lost in the
shuffle. The film’s emotional core remains solid, however, and that means that
while it’s as occasionally messy as the frantic scribbled blueprints tacked to
Turing’s wall, it’s also an ultimately satisfying flick.
– Justin Cummings is
a writer, blogger, playwright, and graduate of Queen's University's
English Language & Literature program. He has been an avid gamer and
industry commentator since he first fed a coin into a Donkey Kong
machine. He is currently pursuing a career in games journalism and
criticism in Toronto.
No comments:
Post a Comment