Nearly all the film analysts here at Critics at Large have taken a crack at the second of Peter Jackson’s fantasy trilogies centering around Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman) and his colourful, high-energy adventure through Middle Earth to The Lonely Mountain (and back again). While my colleagues have enjoyed the movies overall, they've rightly censured the films for the flatness and protraction of their battle sequences, their over-reliance on CGI and technical gimmickry, and the folly of trying to stretch a small adventure novel into a blockbuster trilogy. Peter Jackson's hardly a perfect filmmaker, and one could argue that this latest trilogy of bloated epics is the least worthy of his works (although I would hope that those who’ve seen The Lovely Bones would beg to differ). I don't think many of these directorial choices are necessarily good ones, but as a filmgoer and (an admittedly rabid) franchise fan I must take what I'm given. So: how well does The Battle of Five Armies do what it sets out to do?
Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins |
Scenes of sublime resonance stand out from
the carnage, offering shades of the brilliance of The Lord of the Rings: Legolas parts with his father Thranduil, who
offers a touching conciliation about the elven archer’s long-dead mother; Dwalin,
ostensibly the least sensitive among the dwarven company, watches in pain as
his king and dear friend Thorin is driven mad with greed; Bilbo is given the
coat of mithril that will eventually save Frodo’s life in a scene that begins
tenderly and ends with twangs of sinister derangement; and perhaps my
favourite, Bilbo’s belongings are auctioned off at the entrance to Bag End, the
residents of Hobbiton believing him dead and seeming not to recognize him even
as he stands before them, resplendent in the spoils of his adventure. Jackson
provides these small reminders of his skill at coaxing powerful performances
out of actors in heavy wigs and makeup, none of whom – as
Shlomo pointed out in his review of An
Unexpected Journey – ever condescend to the material. High fantasy works
best when it’s treated as reality, in which the vulnerabilities and weaknesses
of ordinary people are exposed by their extraordinary circumstances (George
R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire
being the other prime example).
Cate Blanchett and Ian McKellen |
In this case, as it was with Interstellar, my cynicism must be
tempered with acceptance.The difference, I think, between these and the odd
choices of other directors is intent. There is only one noticeable instance of cringe-worthy
pandering in Battle of the Five Armies
(the shoehorned reference to "The eagles are coming" from The Return of the King) – but unlike other
big-budget filmmakers such as Michael Bay or Roland Emmerich, Peter Jackson
does not regard his audience with contempt. He simply asks that you completely
suspend your disbelief – which I admit is asking quite a lot, considering the film’s
rock-worms, battle pigs, and slapstick humour riding on the heels of
decapitations and death – and come along with him on his wild ride. You might
question some of the choices he makes in his adaptation of Tolkien's novel, and
that's valid. But if you are able to immerse yourself in his universe, in his
luscious, gorgeously-realized vision of Middle Earth, and let go of your
connection to the cynical world from which he wants to help you escape, you
can't help but be swept along. I'm not saying these films should be immune to
criticism, and I'm certainly not saying they're without fault. But I leave you
with a question: who else is making broadly-enjoyable adventure fantasy epics
of this operatic scale but Peter Jackson? Who else invests those worlds with as
much genuine passion and craft but the wizards at Weta Digital? Who would you turn to
as a replacement – the dour, cerebral
Christopher Nolan? The flashy, brainless Zack Snyder? Or, heaven forbid, Ridley
Scott, who
selects terrible screenplays and seems unwilling or unable to leverage his
talent as a director? I recognize that the Hobbit trilogy is not for everyone, but I ask you: who else would
you trust to do it any sort of justice? It's awfully easy to complain about
plot holes and pacing issues in such wondrous films when there are no
alternatives. I think Jackson deserves at least a little bit of slack, if only
because he’s the only one doing this stuff, and doing it (mostly) right.
– Justin Cummings is a writer, blogger, playwright, and graduate of Queen's University's English Language & Literature program. He has been an avid film buff, gamer, and industry commentator since his childhood cinema first installed an arcade. He is currently helping to make awesome games at Ubisoft Toronto, and continues to pursue a career in professional criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment