|
German officers at a sidewalk café on the Champs-Élysées in July 1940, one month after the Nazi invasion of France. |
“One who has not suffered the horrors of an occupying power has no right to judge a nation that has.”
– Anthony Eden, former British Prime Minister, from The Sorrow and the Pity.
French television refused to air Marcel Ophuls’ landmark 4 1/2-hour documentary,
The Sorrow and the Pity (1969); its 1971 cinematic release
punctured a powerful myth promoted after the war by Charles De Gaulle: that the French nation by and large heroically resisted the Germans during the
four-year occupation. Ophuls makes it clear that the majority of Frenchmen were neither supporters of the Germans nor members of the resistance. Rather,
they went along quietly with the wartime collaborationist government of Marshal Pétain. Regardless of how they behaved, for a variety of reasons, the vast
majority of French citizens opted for remaining silent, even those who acted heroically.
In his prologue to
The Cost of Courage (Other Press,
2015), Charles Kaiser, a former reporter turned author, describes how he first encountered that strange silence when he met the French family
that had lodged his uncle, a GI named Henry Kaiser, in Paris during the last year of the war. From his uncle, Charles heard stories of their heroism: “The
most dramatic movie about the war,” the nephew writes, “was the one I learned by heart but had seen only in my head.” Yet when he finally met the surviving
members of the Boulloche family as a child in the early 1960s, they were reticent about their war experiences: “It would take me five decades, including
two and a half years living in France, to unravel the reasons for the heroes’ silence.” It is the author’s connection with this cultured,
upper-middle-class Catholic family, particularly with the daughter, Christiane, that
gives
The Cost of Courage its distinctive resonance. Only after the death of her siblings is Christiane willing to share with Kaiser the family’s harrowing experiences during
the Occupation. Assisted by declassified British documents, letters, diaries and conversations with the children of the next generation, the author
narrates a powerful account of one family’s courage, guilt and pain. He supplements their story with the larger historical context of the war. Initially,
this device appears jarring, juxtaposing a thriller-like narrative written in the present tense with a more conventional historical overview. But as we
become accustomed to it, it begins to work, especially when he is able to weave the two threads together with the onset of the Allied invasion of Normandy.