Nicholas D’Agosto and John Lithgow |
NBC’s long-running sitcom The
Office left its mark on contemporary television in a number of
ways, not least in the sudden emergence of a number of
mockumentary-style comedies, most notably NBC’s Parks and
Recreation and ABC’s hit Modern Family. However, it’s
striking that both of these shows seem to have essentially discarded
the sub-genre’s main conceit: the idea that everything we see and
hear is being recorded by a camera crew that exists within the world
of the show. The Office spent a considerable portion of its
final season acknowledging that there had been other characters, long
familiar to the denizens of Dunder-Mifflin but completely unknown to
us, present throughout the show’s run, and it dealt
with some of the logical complications that might ensue from that
situation. Parks and Modern Family, on the other hand,
became almost Brecht-lite; characters speak directly to the audience,
calling our attention to the show’s artificiality, but there’s
rarely any pretense that they’re actually talking to a person
behind the camera.
It’s hard not to think of the quirks
of the mockumentary sub-genre while watching NBC’s new Trial and
Error, which premiered on March 14 and airs on Tuesday nights. In
large part, that’s because creators Jeff Astrof and Matthew Miller
seem to have attempted to reverse-engineer the success of The
Office and Parks and Recreation; the latter’s influence
is especially evident from their attempts to quickly establish the
show’s setting, a fictional South Carolina town called East Peck,
as a quirky but lovable backwater, à la the equally fictional Pawnee,
Indiana. Here, the conceit that everything that we see is the result
of a camera crew following around the characters is frequently
acknowledged, oftentimes to satisfying comic effect.
Like NBC’s delightful The Good Place, Trial & Error is heavily serialized, which most half-hour shows tend to shy away from. That might account
for why it airs two episodes on the same night every week, although
that could also indicate an eagerness on NBC’s part to burn off the
episodes as quickly as possible. That latter impulse may not be
unwise: it’s by no means a bad show, but, like many new comedies,
it doesn’t feel like it’s arrived fully developed. This wasn’t
a problem for shows like The Office or Park and Recreation,
both of which had short, forgettable debut seasons, but it matters
more this time because Trial & Error relies so heavily on
its concept.
Jayma Mays and Nicholas D’Agosto (Photo by: Evans Vestal Ward/NBC) |
Among the components of the show that
don’t feel fully realized are the performances, many of which feel
like shtick. D’Agosto’s very much in straight-man mode, and he’s
mostly required to blink in astonishment at East Peck’s quirky
residents or stand agog as each new catastrophe befalls him. Shepherd’s
character somehow manages the (admittedly impressive) paradox of
being both over- and underwritten: she’s an assortment of
idiosyncrasies that stem from her laundry list of bizarre
psychological conditions, which includes an inability to recognize
faces and a compulsion to break out laughing in response to tragedy. It’s both too much and not enough, and it feels
mean-spirited to boot.
On the other hand, some of the
caricatures populating East Peck are broad but appealing, and it’s
worth noting that this happens most consistently when the actors
playing them are allowed to find just a hint of nuance. Boyer’s
Dwayne is in many ways a conventional hayseed stereotype, but there’s
a pathos to his desperate need for acceptance and friendship that
establishes a contrast with his dim-witted hijinks. Rodriguez’s
Summer is on the other end of the scale: she’s clearly meant to be
a normative character whose relative grounding in reality marks
her as Josh’s likely love interest as the narrative progresses.
Still, she gives us hints that she’s not above the wackiness of the
show’s setting, such as the way she plays her sudden onrush of
self-consciousness as she spits out increasingly lame excuses for her
romantic relationship with a local pyromaniac.
John Lithgow is, of course, the star attraction, but, like the rest of the cast, he’s somewhat hindered by the show’s broad tone. He plays otherworldly befuddlement well, but his Larry becomes more interesting and sympathetic when he’s allowed just a hint of humanity, as when his seemingly misplaced outrage over the choice of flowers for his wife’s gravesite reveals itself as an attempt to cope with his grief over her death. Still, his predicament points to a larger issue that bedevils Trial & Error: for a show that’s so heavily dependent on serialization and concerned with a fairly dark topic (Larry is, after all, on trial for his life), its tone prevented me from getting too invested in it. Parks and Recreation had time to build its world and establish the oftentimes serious stakes involved in its goofy characters’ escapades, while The Good Place’s otherworldly and expertly realized setting helps to justify its tonal and narrative oddities. Trial & Error has some funny performers and an intriguing conceptual premise, but right now it simply doesn’t seem capable of reaching the lofty status of its forerunners in the mockumentary sub-genre.
John Lithgow is, of course, the star attraction, but, like the rest of the cast, he’s somewhat hindered by the show’s broad tone. He plays otherworldly befuddlement well, but his Larry becomes more interesting and sympathetic when he’s allowed just a hint of humanity, as when his seemingly misplaced outrage over the choice of flowers for his wife’s gravesite reveals itself as an attempt to cope with his grief over her death. Still, his predicament points to a larger issue that bedevils Trial & Error: for a show that’s so heavily dependent on serialization and concerned with a fairly dark topic (Larry is, after all, on trial for his life), its tone prevented me from getting too invested in it. Parks and Recreation had time to build its world and establish the oftentimes serious stakes involved in its goofy characters’ escapades, while The Good Place’s otherworldly and expertly realized setting helps to justify its tonal and narrative oddities. Trial & Error has some funny performers and an intriguing conceptual premise, but right now it simply doesn’t seem capable of reaching the lofty status of its forerunners in the mockumentary sub-genre.
– Michael Lueger teaches theatre classes at Northeastern University and Emerson College. He's written for WBUR's Cognoscentipage and HowlRound. He also tweets about theatre history at @theaterhistory.
No comments:
Post a Comment