When
Sidney Lumet made a movie of Mary McCarthy’s
The Group in 1966, it was a major event. The 1963 book,
about the intersecting lives of a group of Vassar graduates from the class
of 1933 up to the end of the decade, had been a sensational bestseller,
partly because of the notorious second chapter, where one of the characters
loses her virginity to a married artist. The casting of the eight young
women with mostly unknown actresses rather than movie stars was hotly
debated; Shirley Knight, twice nominated for the Supporting Actress Oscar,
was the only one close to being a known quantity.
Pauline Kael, two years
away from beginning her tenure as
The New Yorker’s film critic
, wrote a long, fascinating piece about the shooting of the
picture for a glossy magazine. (You can read it in her second collection,
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.)
Yet the film never
won general approval – or a single Academy Award nomination. It was,
perhaps, the wrong time for a movie adaptation of a novel that straddled
the line between social commentary and potboiler. The movies that dominated
the art houses in 1966 were, aside from Mike Nichols’s
Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, mostly British imports
that were less daring – and way less substantial – than they purported to
be but that featured the most exciting generation of English actors in
movie history. And within a year the old Hollywood had begun to break apart
while the new Hollywood was taking over. Next to a picture like
Bonnie and Clyde,
The Group felt
old-fashioned, already a relic from the late big-studio era, and it was
quickly forgotten. So was McCarthy herself, not long after. A witty,
literate writer who had broken through with the short story “The Man in the
Brooks Brothers Suit” in 1941 and the novel
The Company She Keeps in 1942, who published one of the
most devastating of all childhood memoirs, the Dickensian 1972
Memories of a Catholic Girlhood, and who was as celebrated
for her literary friendships and feuds (generally tinged with politics:
though initially a member of the
Partisan Review circle,
she was, outspokenly, both liberal and anti-Communist), she was a culture
hero for young women breaking away from conventional gender roles in the
post-war era. But she didn’t class herself as a feminist, and the first
wave of official feminists, in the early and mid-seventies, didn’t identify
with her.